James Webb falsified the Big Bang by discovering a galaxy only 300 million years after the beginning of the universe. and by giving his own color to the words of an astronomer. Before you take the trouble to briefly read the history of imaging such old galaxies.
Robert Williams, director of the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), had the privilege of using the Hubble telescope 10 percent of the time at will. He used this time to spend more than 100 hours in December 1995 near Ursa Major. And Hubble made 150 orbits of the Earth, taking 342 images. It was the first time that humanity has discovered more than 3,000,000 galaxies in an area equal to one-twelfth of the full Moon (2.6 arcminutes) or one in 2.5 million parts of the entire sky. This was named Hubble Deep Field (HDF).
Hubble took its second deep field image (Hubble Ultra Deep Field) in 2004 and the extreme deep field image in 2012. In 2015. Hubble surprised astronomers by discovering the GNz11 galaxy 25 years after its discovery. The redshift of this galaxy was (z=11.09). This galaxy came into being 400 million years after the Big Bang. This is the oldest galaxy ever confirmed.
- The higher the redshift, the older the galaxy.
Read Also: How We Used To Read Books As Children
Now Let’s Talk About 2022
In April 2022, the HD1 and HD2 galaxies were studied using data from the Hubble and Subaru telescopes by University of Tokyo experts. Estimated that they have a redshift of 13.27, meaning they are 324 million years after the Big Bang. Born later, this galaxy is the oldest known yet to be confirmed.
Now comes the age of James Webb and within a few months of his life, he discovered a galaxy (GLz13) with an age of 13.787 billion years and a redshift of 13.1, 329 million years after the Big Bang. Is. It was an alarming discovery, not only because it found a very old galaxy, but the surprising components of the galaxy gave an astronomer sleepless nights. She is astronomer Allison Kirkpatrick and works at the University of Kansas her statement was also published in the journal Nature. The statement was this.
“At 3 o’clock in the morning I find myself lying awake in bed wondering if everything I did was wrong.”Allison Kirkpatrick
Just this statement caught the hands of social media, news channels, and especially anti-Big Bang groups. Then it became difficult to stop the uproar they created. Eric Lerner is a man who has been opposed to the Big Bang theory since the beginning. Published an article in the Institute of Art and Ideas in which he stated that James Webb disproved the Big Bang by discovering such a distant galaxy. done. Well, it is getting long, today we have to look at this thing from a scientific point of view so that common people. Astronomy enthusiasts like us can avoid such things.
The galaxy GLz13, discovered by James Webb, is estimated to be 13.787 billion years old from its redshift and is the oldest galaxy ever discovered, 1600 light-years in diameter compared to the Milky Way. The diameter is 1 lakh light years. But remember one thing the research paper about this has just been submitted and is not yet peer-reviewed which means it is only preliminary research.
What Is This In The Galaxy?
What is it in this galaxy that is causing this objection and even the experts are confused and puzzled?
It’s being brighter than usual
It has a clear structure that galaxies of this age should not have.
Such a young galaxy has features that develop after much longer ages that are not present in younger galaxies.
First of all, this objection from someone who already does not believe in the Big Bang is not new and scientific research is necessary to believe it.
Scientists answer this, Big Bang opponents do not give any justification for the existence of cosmic microwave background radiation. Second, the brightness of this galaxy depends on its type. This galaxy is a Lyman-break galaxy, which is very bright in its early age. Telescopes looking in the infrared and ultraviolet spectrum have made it easier to study such galaxies. In the early universe. Due to its smaller expansion. The temperature was much higher, and the process of star formation was much faster than it is today. And above all, the data that James Webb will provide to improve existing models may change the way we estimate the age of the universe.
I mean that the theory of the origin of the universe, including the formation of stars, and the formation of galaxies. The expansion of the universe, and the death of stars, are all theories based on data from the best instruments. Better data and modern research on that data do not disprove scientific theories but remove the errors of calculation in them. Which makes science better.
The Simple Method Is Science
- See the source of any scientific information
- Look at the narrator’s competence and impartiality
- and the collective response of experts in that knowledge to it.